We’re used to thinking hugely well of democracy. But interestingly, one of the wisest people who ever lived, Socrates, had deep suspicions of it. For gifts and more from The School of Life, visit our online shop: https://goo.gl/mQYmze Join our exclusive mailing list: http://bit.ly/2e0TQNJ Or visit us in person at our London HQ: https://goo.gl/8UR9P5 Download our App: https://goo.gl/hjJSjx FURTHER READING “We are used to thinking very highly of democracy – and by extension, of Ancient Athens, the civilisation that gave rise to it. The Parthenon has become almost a byword for democratic values, which is why so many leaders of democracies like to be photographed among its ruins…” You can read more on Philosophy and other topics on our blog TheBookofLife.org at this link: https://goo.gl/Sc9kXf MORE SCHOOL OF LIFE Our website has classes, articles and products to help you think and grow: https://goo.gl/VY9gDt Watch more films on Philosophy in our playlist: http://bit.ly/TSOLphilosophy Do you speak a different language to English? Did you know you can submit Subtitles on all of our videos on YouTube? For instructions how to do this click here: https://goo.gl/wE1wvm SOCIAL MEDIA Feel free to follow us at the links below: Download our App: https://goo.gl/hjJSjx Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theschooloflifelondon/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSchoolOfLife Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theschooloflifelondon/ CREDITS Produced in collaboration with: Mike Booth http://www.youtube.com/somegreybloke #TheSchoolOfLife
Views: 3978617 The School of Life
Political correctness aims for some very nice results, but its means have a habit of upsetting a lot of people. Might there be an alternative to it? We think there is, and it’s called Politeness. If you like our films, take a look at our shop (we ship worldwide): https://goo.gl/iVqWJ1 Join our mailing list: http://bit.ly/2e0TQNJ Or visit us in person at our London HQ https://goo.gl/6YnJ6i FURTHER READING “Political Correctness is, in many ways, an extraordinary and admirable achievement of our age. It involves an acute sensitivity to the suffering of minority groups traditionally overlooked by the dominant forces in society – and a commitment to teasing out examples of adversity in the large but also the small moments of daily life. Its aim is to spread empathy, justice and fairness...” You can read more on this and other subjects on our blog, here: https://goo.gl/WQst5l MORE SCHOOL OF LIFE Our website has classes, articles and products to help you think and grow: https://goo.gl/ccHQ0e Watch more films on CAPITALISM in our playlist: http://bit.ly/TSOLcapitalism You can submit translations and transcripts on all of our videos here: https://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?c=UC7IcJI8PUf5Z3zKxnZvTBog&tab=2 Find out how more here: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en-GB SOCIAL MEDIA Feel free to follow us at the links below: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theschooloflifelondon/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSchoolOfLife Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theschooloflifelondon/ CREDITS Produced in collaboration with: Nick Hilditch http://nickhilditch.com/ #TheSchoolOfLife
Views: 339383 The School of Life
The Open University’s Dr David Scott suggests some alternatives to prison. Read the article http://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/criminology/radical-alternatives-prison?in_menu=689650 Free learning from The Open University http://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/criminology/the-growing-demand-drugs-uk-prisons (Part 3 of 3) Playlist link - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_xR5VOJ9eA&list=PLhQpDGfX5e7BUz2FF-_sJ4c1BPRar0gzq Transcript - Study Human Rights and the Law free at the Open University http://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/human-rights-and-law/content-section-0?active-tab=description-tab Study BA (Honours) Criminology http://www.open.ac.uk/courses/qualifications/r21 The Open University is the world’s leading provider of flexible, high quality online degrees and distance learning, serving students across the globe with highly respected degree qualifications, and the triple accredited MBA. The OU teaches through its own unique method of distance learning, called ‘supported open learning’ and you do not need any formal qualifications to study with us, just commitment and a desire to find out what you are capable of. Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ouopenlearn/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OUFreeLearning
Views: 1485 OpenLearn from The Open University
"Behind every rise of fascism is a failed revolution," said the Frankfurt School thinker Walter Benjamin. Here, Slavoj Žižek revives that statement in the context of the failed left. Zizek's latest book is "Refugees, Terror and Other Troubles with the Neighbors: Against the Double Blackmail" (https://goo.gl/m2Aj7S). Read more at BigThink.com: http://bigthink.com/videos/slavoj-zizek-on-the-failures-of-the-leftist-movement Follow Big Think here: YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink Transcript - I still believe in the saying of this oath Frankford School fellow traveler Marxist Valter Benjamin who said that behind every rise of fascism there is a failed revolution. I think even if we strategically, I'm not sure about it, accept this term Islam fascism for Islamic fundamentalist, this so called Islam fundamentalism is strictly relative with the disintegration of secular Islamic left, which was pretty strong in the '50s, '60s and so on, but then began to disintegrate. So I think we shouldn't be too fascinated with this phenomenon. We should rather ask what happened with the left. I think this phenomenon of right wing populism are strictly the obverse of something that did not happen. They didn't just happen, they happened because something else didn't happen because the left didn't provide a proper answer. And that's for me the true tragedy today. On the one hand we are entering a period, and we are already in this period for almost ten years, where rage, discontent are exploding everywhere, even in our Western countries, Occupy Wall Street in Europe, the demonstrations in France, Greece and so on. On the other hand it is as if the left, even if it succeeds in, sometimes not always, in recapturing the energy of this rage cannot really offer a new political model that would be not only seductive enough to mobilize millions of people, but even in itself it doesn't have enough consistency. What I'm saying is this, in Europe we didn't yet fully accept the fact that the 20th century is over. By this I mean the following: The 20th century left, which had basically three strengths orientations, Stalinist communism, that's over. Not only it's over, in a beautiful irony where ex-communists are still in power they are mostly the most efficient agents of the most ruthless new liberal global capitalism. Do you know what I mean? If you want to be a successful capitalist today don't go to Western Europe, go to China where every Chinese will tell you the main function, almost, of the communist party is to prevent the formation of an independent working movement trade unions to keep workers under control, Vietnam the same story and so on. Read Full Transcript Here: https://goo.gl/Ep3N3a.
Views: 394902 Big Think
Francis Fukuyama '74 joined panelists John Mearsheimer, Peter Katzenstein and Isabel Hull Nov. 18, 2014 in a Foreign Policy forum marking the 25th anniversary of his landmark essay, "The End of History."
Views: 46887 Cornell University
There are more forms of hepatitis than there are major parties in America. Subscribe to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/reasontv Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magazine Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reason Subscribe to our podcast at Apple Podcasts: https://goo.gl/az3a7a Reason is the planet's leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines. ---------------- Nearly a dozen Democrats are already running for president. The highlights so far include an interview about immigration livestreamed from a dental chair, a former Harvard professor popping a beer like jes' plain folks on New Year's Eve, and a draconian former prosecutor pledging her allegiance to Wakanda. Democrats are tripping over each other to pitch Medicare for All, Free College for All, Guaranteed Jobs for All, and laying taxes on wealth as well as income. And then there's Howard Schultz. The former CEO of Starbucks is considering a run for president as a "centrist independent." He says that the national debt threatens economic growth, that we shouldn't demonize successful entrepreneurs, and that the government can't be all things to all people. That brought public hate, contempt, and character assassination from every conceivable angle. It's not just anti-globalist lefties on the attack. The New York Times' op-ed page says he's narcissistic, delusional, and fanatical. His potential run, his critics claim, would be nothing short of "reckless idiocy." But Schultz's belief that neither major party represents America is widely shared. A plurality of Americans don't identify with either party. And nearly three-quarters of us think the country is headed in the wrong direction, which helps to explain why neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump won a majority of the popular vote in 2016. The two-party duopoly and its supporters in the media understand how widely disliked they are, which is why they want to kneecap anyone who isn't on Team Red or Team Blue. You don't have to agree with Schultz to understand that having more voices and ideas on the table at this point in the election cycle is a good thing—especially when you consider the alternatives. Democrats fear people such as Schultz because they think he will drain votes from whoever their nominee ends up being, giving Trump a path to re-election. But that's actually a faulty analysis. Former Republican Rep. John Anderson was blamed for pulling votes from Jimmy Carter in 1980, but almost half his supporters would have gone with Reagan as their second choice. In 1992, the GOP fingered Ross Perot as a political saboteur, but the 19 percent of Americans who pulled the lever for the Texas Billionaire were equally split between Bush and Clinton as their fallback. In 2016, socially liberal and fiscally conservative voters—Schultz's demographic—broke for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, suggesting the coffee-shop magnate would pull votes from the incumbent president rather than his Democratic challenger. Four years ago, during his attempt to win the Democratic nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) complained that we don't "need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants." If variety in armpit aroma isn't his thing, I'd like to believe that the Vermont socialist would at least favor more choice at the ballot box. Right now, there are more forms of hepatitis than viable political parties in America. So it's kind of fitting that the former CEO of a company that introduced infinite choice in coffee drinks is now being dragged for threatening to expand the political spectrum all the way from A to C. If American politics can't stand even the possibility of an independent candidate who praises capitalism, opposes massive tax increases, and wants to reduce federal debt, we're already screwed. Edited by Mark McDaniel. Cameras by Jim Epstein. Graphics by Joshua Swain. Ghost Dance by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Photo Credits: David Becker/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Brian Cahn/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Brian Cahn/TNS/Newscom; Rick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom; Imagine China/Newscom; Everett Collection/Newscom; Arnie Sachs/SIPA/Newscom; Mark Reinstein/ZUMA Press/Newscom; JASON REDMOND/REUTERS/Newscom
Views: 24272 ReasonTV
Hope you like this video If you like this video please share ⏩ it and press bell icon 🔔 Also subscribe this channel it give us motivation. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLBy3SGxGHxQy0P_LBG_7jw Tags: knowledge hunt, renu gadda, krati, history class12, bricks beads bones class12, kinship caste and class 12, studyship, studyship with krati, political science class 12, pol.sci, Alternative Centres of Power, altrnt centre of powr, Alternative Centres Of Power Part 1 || POLITICAL SCIENCE || NCERT, NCERT Video Lecture Series in Political Science: Alternative Centres of Power 1, Chapter - 4 Alternative center of power, Political Science By Vivek Sir, Samim Asgor Ali, learner.in, Gyaan Uday, Apoorve Jain, E LEARNING, Eklavya Study Point, alternative centres of power class 12 in hindi, alternative centres of power notes, Alternative Centres of Power in hindi, Alternative center of power in hindi, Chapter 4 political science in hindi, सत्ता के वैकल्पिक केंद्र, कक्षा 12 राजनीति विज्ञान, Gyaanuday, pratichi pol., pratichipol, Political Science Class 12: Alternative Centers of Power, Part-1, Chapter-4, class12 political science chapter 4, European Union, nishu choudhry class 12 political science chapter 4, nishu choudhry political science, Marshall plan, ncert important questions, सत्ता के वैकल्पिक केंद्र, ncert 12 political science chapter 4, Alternative Centres of power, altrnates centrs of powr, Alternative Centres Of Power Part 1 || POLITICAL SCIENCE || NCERT, NCERT Video Lecture Series in Political Science: Alternative Centres of Power 1, Chapter - 4 Alternative center of power, Political Science By Vivek Sir, Samim Asgor Ali, pratichi pol., learner.in, Gyaan Uday, Apoorve Jain, Aman Dhattarwal, E LEARNING, Eklavya Study Point, alternative centres of power class 12 in hindi, Alternative Centres of Power in hindi, Satta ke vekalpik kendra, Political science in hindi, Class 12 political science in Hindi, Class xII political science in Hindi, Class 12 hindi political science notes, Alternative center of power in hindi, Chapter 4 political science in hindi, सत्ता के वैकल्पिक केंद्र, कक्षा 12 राजनीति विज्ञान, Gyaanuday, Naushad sir, aao milkar bachaye class 11, galta loha class 11, hindi vidai sambhashan class 11, bharat mata class 11 hindi, rajasthan ki rajat boondein class 11, spiti me barish class 11, jamun ka ped class 11, aalo andhari class 11, miya nasiruddin class 11 hindi, aatma ka tap class 11 hindi, ve aankhen class 11 hindi, jansanchar class 11, bhartiya gayikao me bejod lata mangeshkar class 11, aalekh in hindi format, invisible man novel class 12 in hindi, class 11 hindi sabse khatarnak, alo andhari class 11 hindi summary, champa kale kale akshar nahi chinti, rajasthan ki rajat bunde, apu ke sath dhai saal class 11 summary, saharsh swikara hai class 12, aalo andhari class 11 summary, champa kale kale akshar nahi chinti class 11 summary, rajni class 11 hindi, vidai sambhashan class 11 summary, aatma ka tap class 11, class 11 hindi aao milkar bachaye, atmaparichay class 12 explanation, appu ke sath dhai saal class 11 hindi, namak ka daroga, galta loha akkamahadevi class 11, sabse khatarnak, ghar ki yaad class 11, pathik class 11 hindi, sabse khatarnak class 11, sabse khatarnak class 11 hindi, kabir class 11 hindi, class 11 hindi rajni, class 11 alo andhari, class 11hindi gazal, class 11 hindi class 11, sabse khatarnak, hindi class 11 aao milkar bachaye, class 11 galta loha, class 11 hindi vidai sambhashan, class 11 bharat mata, class 11 hindi rajasthan ki rajat boondein, class 11 spiti me barish, class 11 jamun ka ped, class 11 aalo andhari, class 11 miya nasiruddin, class 11 hindi aatma ka tap, class 11 hindi, ve aankhen class 11 hindi Telegram channel https://t.me/knowledgeHuntAnkitgoyalClassess Join us on WHATSAPP 7027424007 Join us on FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/ankit.goyal.568089 Join us on INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/mr_ankit_goyal_official?r=nametag Also send us a comment about this video Contact for notes and sample books of highly qualified teacher's 7027424007 (only whatsapp) By knowledge hunt
Views: 51 Knowledge Hunt
What the difference in brain structure between liberals and conservatives? And where do our political convictions come from: rational deliberation, or biological determinism? Psychiatrist Gail Saltz explains. Read more at BigThink.com: http://bigthink.com/videos/gail-saltz-the-brain-differences-of-liberals-versus-conservatives Follow Big Think here: YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink Transcript - So I think what’s really fascinating is that there have been a number of recent studies looking at brain structural differences between liberals and conservatives. And what’s been found in several studies is that liberals tend to have a larger anterior cingulate gyrus. That is an area that is responsible for taking in new information and that impact of the new information on decision making or choices. Conservatives tended on the whole to have a larger right amygdala. Amygdala being a deeper brain structure that processes more emotional information - specifically fear based information. So it’s really responsible for the flight or fright response. And this isn’t everybody. It’s not black and white and of course then, you know, what about all of the people in the middle? But basically the study showed that if you just based it on brain structural size different you could predict who would be a conservative and who would be a liberal with frequency of 71.6 percent. 71.6 percent is a pretty high ability to predict who is a conservative and who is a liberal just from brain structure. When you look at what your parents were in terms of predicting what you might be in terms of conservative versus liberal, that enabled you to predict in studies at a rate of 69.5 percent. So very close. Not quite as good and why is that interesting? It’s because the brain is plastic. So the question as to whether you have a brain structure to start with that informs whether you will be a liberal or conservative or whether the formation of certain thoughts from your parents for example shapes your brain structure. Because the brain is plastic and ever changing, particularly in youth. So does thinking certain thoughts or predominantly let’s say utilizing your right amygdala versus your anterior cingulate gyrus inform the growth of those areas and therefore help you predict later who is liberal and who is conservative. So in terms of interpreting the meaning of different sized structures for a liberal versus a conservative I think you have to look at what that area is predominantly responsible for. So for instance for conservatives if you’re right amygdala is enlarged and that’s the fear processing area you would expect maybe choices or decisions or character and personality to be more informed by a response to a fearful situation. So for example conservatives in fact in personality studies do tend to rate higher in areas of stability, loyalty, not liking change, being more religiously involved in terms of decision making, having that rate higher for them in making certain choices. And if you look at liberals from a personality character standpoint you’re going to find stronger ratings in terms of liking change wanting to actually base decision making on new information, on science information. And so those differences are not surprising in light of these brain structural differences. Being a liberal or being a conservative really is not black and white. It’s really a bell shaped curve where, you know, someone who considers themselves conservative may be far less conservative so to speak than someone else who still calls themselves a conservative. And that bell shaped curve continues all the way through where in the middle there may be a large group that calls themselves independents.
Views: 245328 Big Think
One of America’s most distinguished political thinkers took the John Adams Institute stage for the second time to discuss his far-ranging exploration of history and society. Francis Fukuyama’s book is about how states form, but while it goes back into the distant past, its relevance is very up-to-date. How did ancient societies relinquish their tribal ties in favor of a strong central government? The West has long supported democracy as an organizing principle, and has pushed tribal societies to change. But how realistic is that? Francis Fukuyama also visited the John Adams Institute in 2014 and 1995. Moderator: Frans Timmermans In cooperation with Contact publishers
Views: 15859 The John Adams Institute
Support #TheDeshBhakt & Join the Independent Satire Club on 1. Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/akashbanerjee 2. Instamojo - http://imojo.in/fixm3d Stay up to date with - news / politics / society / satire on #Twitter - @akashbanerjee #Instagram & #Facebook - @akashbanerjee.in ----------------------- Ep. 50 of The Desh Bhakt takes a closer look at the biggest question looming over the nation ... if not Modi - then WHO? More than the economy / communalism / women's safety / foreign relations - this is one question that has people stumped. The Desh Bhakt (in national interest) decided to test what are the qualities needed for a PM and who could be alternatives (if at all) Enjoy / Share / Engage!
Views: 408073 Akash Banerjee
In which Jacob Clifford and Adriene Hill teach you about Economic Systems and Macroeconomics. So, economics is basically about choices. We'll look at some of the broadest economic choices when we talk about the difference between planned economies and market economies. We'll get into communism, socialism, command economies, and capitalism. We'll look at how countries choose the kind of system they're going to use (spoiler alert: many end up with mixed economies). We'll also look into how individuals make economic choices. Crash Course is now on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Mark Brouwer, Jan Schmid, Anna-Ester Volozh, Robert Kunz, Jason A Saslow, Christian Ludvigsen, Chris Peters, Brad Wardell, Beatrice Jin, Roger C. Rocha, Eric Knight, Jessica Simmons, Jeffrey Thompson, Elliot Beter, Today I Found Out, James Craver, Ian Dundore, Jessica Wode, SR Foxley, Sandra Aft, Jacob Ash, Steve Marshall TO: Everyone FROM: Martin To gild refined gold is just silly. TO: Dana FROM: Cameron Still holding out. We're going to make it! Thank you so much to all of our awesome supporters for their contributions to help make Crash Course possible and freely available for everyone forever: Raymond Cason, Marcel Pogorzelski, Cowgirlgem, Chua Chen Wei, Catherine Emond, Victoria Uney, Robin Uney, Damian Shaw, Sverre Rabbelier Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 1623958 CrashCourse
Government publishes its analysis on Theresa May's Brexit plan vs. alternatives & more. We're new! Subscribe to Core Politics ►► https://goo.gl/aLFBjC CONNECT WITH CORE POLITICS Twitter: https://twitter.com/CorePoliticsTV Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CorePolitics Web: http://www.corepolitics.tv ABOUT CORE POLITICS Based at studios down the road from Westminster, we are an online television channel, offering on-demand, bite-sized politics news digests and interviews with leading political opinion formers from Westminster and beyond. Made by Core London
Views: 380 Core Politics
What is political extremism? Professor of psychology Jordan Peterson points out that America knows what right-wing radicalism looks like: The doctrine of racial superiority is where conservatives have drawn the line. "What’s interesting is that on the conservative side of the spectrum we’ve figured out how to box-in the radicals and say, 'No, you’re outside the domain of acceptable opinion,'" says Peterson. But where's that line for the Left? There is no universal marker of what extreme liberalism looks like, which is devastating to the ideology itself but also to political discourse as a whole. Fortunately, Peterson is happy to suggest such a marker: "The doctrine of equality of outcome. It seems to me that that’s where people who are thoughtful on the Left should draw the line, and say no. Equality of opportunity? [That's] not only fair enough, but laudable. But equality of outcome…? It’s like: 'No, you’ve crossed the line. We’re not going there with you.'" Peterson argues that it's the ethical responsibility of left-leaning people to identify liberal extremism and distinguish themselves from it the same way conservatives distance themselves from the doctrine of racial superiority. Failing to recognize such extremism may be liberalism's fatal flaw. Jordan Peterson is the author of 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos Read more at BigThink.com: http://bigthink.com/videos/jordan-peterson-the-fatal-flaw-lurking-in-american-leftist-politics Follow Big Think here: YouTube: http://goo.gl/CPTsV5 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom Twitter: https://twitter.com/bigthink Transcript: I would like to talk briefly about depolarization on the Left and the Right, because I think there’s a technical problem that needs to be addressed. So here’s what I’ve been thinking about. It’s been obvious to me for some time that, for some reason, the fundamental claim of post-modernism is something like an infinite number of interpretations and no canonical overarching narrative. Okay, but the problem with that is: okay, now what? No narrative, no value structure that is canonically overarching, so what the hell are you going to do with yourself? How are you going to orient yourself in the world? Well, the post-modernists have no answer to that. So what happens is they default—without any real attempt to grapple with the cognitive dissonance—they default to this kind of loose, egalitarian Marxism. And if they were concerned with coherence that would be a problem, but since they’re not concerned with coherence it doesn’t seem to be a problem. But the force that’s driving the activism is mostly the Marxism rather than the post-modernism. It’s more like an intellectual gloss to hide the fact that a discredited economic theory is being used to fuel an educational movement and to produce activists. But there’s no coherence to it. It’s not like I’m making this up, you know. Derrida himself regarded—and Foucault as well—they were barely repentant Marxists. They were part of the student revolutions in France in the 1960s, and what happened to them, essentially—and what happened to Jean-Paul Sartre for that matter—was that by the end of the 1960s you couldn’t be conscious and thinking and pro-Marxist. There’s so much evidence that had come pouring in from the former Soviet Union, from the Soviet Union at that point, and from Maoist China, of the absolutely devastating consequences of the doctrine that it was impossible to be apologetic for it by that point in time. So the French intellectuals in particular just pulled off a sleight of hand and transformed Marxism into post-modern identity politics. And we’ve seen the consequence of that. It’s not good. It’s a devolution into a kind of tribalism that will tear us apart on the Left and on the Right. In my house, I have a very large collection of socialist, realist paintings from the former Soviet Union—propaganda pieces, but also kind of harsh impressionist pieces of working-class people and so forth—and I collected them for a variety of reasons. Now you could debate about the propriety of that given the murderousness of those regimes. And fair enough, I have my reasons. But I don’t have paintings from the Nazi era in my house, and I wouldn’t. And that’s been a puzzlement to me because I regard the communists, the totalitarian communist regimes, as just as murderous as the Nazi regimes. But there’s an evil associated with the Nazi regime that seems more palpable in some sense. So I’ve been thinking about that for a long time. And then I’ve been thinking about a corollary to that, which is part of the problem with our current political debate. On the Right, I think we’ve identified markers for people who have gone too far in their ideological presuppositions. And it looks to me like the marker we’ve identified is racial superiority.
Views: 601914 Big Think
Maha govt wasn't ready for the plastic ban as they have no alternatives & should not fine people: Raj Thackeray. To Subscribe our YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/abpnewstv About Channel: ABP News is a news hub which provides you with the comprehensive up-to-date news coverage from all over India and World. Get the latest top stories, current affairs, sports, business, entertainment, politics, astrology, spirituality, and many more here only on ABP News. ABP News is a popular Hindi News Channel made its debut as STAR News in March 2004 and was rebranded to ABP News from 1st June 2012. The vision of the channel is 'Aapko Rakhe Aagey' -the promise of keeping each individual ahead and informed. ABP News is best defined as a responsible channel with a fair and balanced approach that combines prompt reporting with insightful analysis of news and current affairs. ABP News maintains the repute of being a people's channel. Its cutting-edge formats, state-of-the-art newsrooms commands the attention of 48 million Indians weekly. Watch Live on http://abpnews.abplive.in/live-tv ABP Hindi: http://abpnews.abplive.in/ ABP English: http://www.abplive.in/ Download ABP App for Apple: https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/abp-live-abp-news-abp-ananda/id811114904?mt=8 Download ABP App for Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.winit.starnews.hin&hl=en Social Media Handles: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abpnewstv/?hl=en Facebook ABP News (English): https://www.facebook.com/abplive/?ref=br_rs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/abpnews/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/abpnewstv Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/1/+abpnews
Views: 13210 ABP NEWS
Featuring Emma Ashford, Research Fellow, Cato Institute (@EmmaMAshford); John Glaser, Director of Foreign Policy Studies, Cato Institute (@jwcglaser); Caleb O. Brown, Director of Multimedia, Cato Institute (@cobrown). President Trump has repeatedly signaled his intention to declare Iran in violation of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal. The problem is that Iran is in fact complying with its obligations under the deal, which significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program, imposed strict limits on what remained, and subjected Iran to the most intrusive inspections regime in the world. The alternative policy options outside the JCPOA are unappealing. In a new Cato Policy Analysis, Emma Ashford and John Glaser assess the costs of four alternatives – sanctions, challenging Iranian influence in the Middle East, supporting internal groups to foment regime change, and military action – and conclude they all carry unacceptably high risks and threaten to exacerbate the very behavior Iran hawks hope to forestall.
Views: 289 The Cato Institute
John Mearsheimer, professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, provides the first systematic analysis of lying as a tool of statecraft. He identifies the varieties, the reasons, and the potential costs and benefits, arguing that leaders often lie for good strategic reasons, while distinguishing between lying to another state and lying to one's own people. John Mearsheimer is also the co-director of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago and has written extensively about security issues and international politics. The World Beyond the Headlines is a project of the Center for International Studies, which brings scholars, journalists, and world leaders to the University to discuss issues of current global importance. For more information on this event, visit https://cis.uchicago.edu/events/2010-2011/mearsheimer-truth-about-lying-in-international-politics Information on the entire The World Beyond the Headlines series can be found at http://cis.uchicago.edu/wbh This program was organized by the University of Chicago Center for International Studies and co-sponsored by the Seminary Co-op Bookstore and the International House Global Voices Program. April 7, 2011. ➡ Subscribe: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGOytSubscribe About #UChicago: A destination for inquiry, research, and education, the University of Chicago empowers scholars to challenge conventional thinking. Our diverse community of creative thinkers celebrates ideas, and is celebrated for them. #UChicago on the Web: Home: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGO-home News: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGO-news Facebook: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGO-FB Twitter: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGO-TW Instagram: http://bit.ly/UCHICAGO-IG University of Chicago on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/uchicago *** ACCESSIBILITY: If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please email [email protected]
Views: 51459 The University of Chicago
The Student Budget Consultation is a civic education and financial literacy program for high school students across Canada. The process gives young people an opportunity to learn about government and current affairs, debate varying viewpoints about public policy and offer their own opinion on the priorities of the federal budget. Visit the Student Budget Consultation website: http://www.civix.ca/sbc/ Register your school today: http://studentvote.ca/sbc/index.php
Views: 656 CIVIXCanada
tranzit.ro/Cluj Culture and Politics of Crisis V 21.06 2017 Europe: Economic Crisis and Political Alternatives Mark Blyth & Michael Roberts Where is Europe going and what can be done about its economic malaise? The final instalment of our series of lectures ‘Culture and Politics of Crisis’ focuses on the current European political and economic deadlock. As such, it sets the stage for a dialogue between two of the most important political economists of our time: Mark Blyth and Michael Roberts. For Roberts, the European crisis is diagnosed from a Marxist perspective. For Blyth, the analysis is infused by heterodox Keynesian views. Consequently, the two scholars diverge both in terms of situating the main cause of crisis and the main solution to it: for Roberts the emphasis falls on the general fall of the rate of profit affecting capital in our time, with anti-capitalism as the solution. For Blyth the crisis is caused by a lack of demand and investment and the way out is a different kind of capitalism. Between these diverging diagnostics and challenging solutions affecting the global and continental predicament, the fate of the East of Europe will also come in the spotlight: what are the limits of the semi-peripheral condition of this region and what remedies does it permit – Lexit, national sovereignty, regionalism à la Visegrad? Is a reformed, more social and egalitarian EU possible? Or, if not, how – or even why? – should we stop its nationalist disintegration? Mark Blyth teaches at Brown University, and is the author of Great Transformations. Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the 20th Century (2002) and Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea (2015). Michael Roberts is a Marxist economist living in London, author of The Great Recession (2009) and The Long Depression (2016). Moderators: Cornel Ban (Boston University, author of How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local (2016)) Alex Cistelecan (Petru Maior University, CriticAtac)
Views: 31475 tranzit.ro
In his keynote speech at the MatchPoints Seminar 2017 at Aarhus University, professor Francis Fukuyama discussed the significance of the Reformation on the development of the modern European state. He also emphasized the the role of Martin Luther when it comes to the formation of a modern concept of identity.
Views: 5178 Aarhus Universitet
Skip ahead to first speaker at 7:18 Recovering Alternative Futures. Socialism and Democracy, Empire and Nation in 1917 and 2017. A Discussion with Geoff Eley and Ronald Grigor Suny. ------------------ An event organized by Michael D. Kennedy and Juho Korhonen With the support of Maud Mandel, Dean of the College, Brown University, The Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Department of History, Brown University, and Department of Sociology, Brown University. In 1917, the fates of empires, the courses of nationalism, and the prospects of revolution defined political alternatives; by the end of that year, revolutionary socialism animated Russian state power. Its succeeding Soviet Union and subsequent state transformations made with its example in mind shaped the short 20th century. In 2017, the fates of empires, the courses of nationalism, and radical transformations of a different sort define political alternatives. While political and economic structures shape the terms of our alternative futures, the possibilities embryonic in this world historical conjuncture are various. Historical depth and political imagination might not only inform how we understand the 21st century ahead, but plausibly shape it.
Thanks to my sponsor Dollar Shave Club new members can get their 1st month of the Executive Razor with a tube of their Dr. Carver’s Shave Butter for ONLY $5 with FREE shipping exclusively at http://www.dollarshaveclub.com/nerdwriter Watch Chris Stuckmann and Doug Walker's (Nostalgia Critic) joint review of Passengers here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaRu2pFVJHw Subscribe to Chris Stuckmann: https://www.youtube.com/user/ChrisStuckmann Subscribe to Nostalgia Critic: https://www.youtube.com/user/achannelthatsawesome Peter Sciretta's overview of how the original script was different from the movie: http://www.slashfilm.com/passengers-ending/ MUSIC: Kevin Macleod, "Arpent" https://freepd.com/Electronic/Arpent MY RULES FOR SPONSORSHIPS: 1) Sponsor cannot choose video topic. 2) Sponsor cannot give notes or ask for changes. 3) Sponsor cannot see video before it airs. 4) Sponsorship will not be integrated into the "video proper" in any way, but only appear on the end-screen after a few seconds of black. 5) I have to be sympathetic with the brand/client.
Views: 2901239 Nerdwriter1